A bit of peanut butter lured the wee mammal out from the rocky lands of Djibouti in the Horn of Africa. A newly described supergiant species of “sea bug” — a marine arthropod known as an isopod — was recently discovered in the Indian Ocean. The eyes of a trilobite — an armored arthropod that lived almost half-a-billion years ago — resemble the compound eyes of modern bees. New analysis of the ancient crocodylian Deinosuchus confirms that this apex predator had jaws and teeth that were powerful enough to subdue massive dinosaur prey. Digital models of a fish skull revealed a parasitic stowaway inside its mouth: a “tongue biter” isopod that consumed and then replaced the fish’s tongue. Recent reports of dramatic declines in insect populations have sparked concern about an ‘insect apocalypse. It’s unclear what killed this roughly year-old male woolly mammoth at least 10, years ago.
New Scientist magazine subscription
Digital subscriptions are available for this title. Digital Subscriptions are supplied by Zinio, who will deliver the digital editions direct to your inbox – you can access them directly through your web browser or download the Zinio app on your mobile device. New Scientist offers a comprehensive round up of news, ideas, exclusive content and the latest science and technology breakthroughs. Delve into the world of science and enjoy the wit, wisdom and wonder New Scientist has to offer.
New Scientist: What’s hot? [ New Scientist] pdf. Blinded by Science in the Online Dating Game [ The New York Times] pdf.
By Aviva Rutkin. ONE Saturday night last year, 11 people went looking for love. Like countless speed daters before them, they met in a room draped with curtains, the lights on low. In one hand they held traditional glasses of bubbly , but in the other were sheets of paper they had filled with their personal data. This twist on speed-dating was part of an experiment run by a team at Newcastle University in the UK. They wanted to know what would happen in a world where instead of vetting potential dates by their artfully posed selfies or carefully crafted dating-site profiles, we looked at data gathered by their computers and phones.
Elsden and his colleagues want to explore other ways we can use data that gets collected as we go about our modern lives. The team recruited their speed daters on social media and via posters around their university campus. A week before the event, the participants were sent a form to fill out. It asked for a host of specific numbers: shoe size, the farthest distance they had travelled from home, the earliest and latest times of day they had sent an email in the past month, their heart rate as they filled out the form.
It also left blank spaces for people to add whatever data they wanted. Seven men and four women took part. The event then took the form of traditional speed-dating, with four minutes for pairs to get to know each other. They read out their numbers, compared stats and even complimented one another on their data.
Metadating helps you find love based on your everyday data
If you’re a human and see this, please ignore it. If you’re a scraper, please click the link below :- Note that clicking the link below will block access to this site for 24 hours. I really like it, subscribe, and read when I get the time — though usually from an RSS feed. Which is why I missed the new launch of their online dating service a couple of weeks ago, just noticing now a funky little module on their homepage that looks like this:.
Kind of random, you know. A little … uh, unusual.
Online dating with New Scientist Connect – find chemistry with other.
I am confident and can be good I can be quiet, sensible and contemplative but I also have a silly side! I am a mum to a wonderful 4 year old I am a very kind, intelligent, generous, chatty and caring person, very loyal to my friends and family and go
The exact cause of death is unknown, according to a team from the University of California, Davis, but fossils reveal the predator died shortly after its enormous meal. This is the largest fossil ever found inside another creature, according to the team behind the discovery, who said it took several years before they accepted the find. People wearing a face mask were seven times more likely to wash their hands, 20 times more likely avoid handshakes, and 13 times more likely to stick to distancing.
NEW Researchers from the US have found that many of the genetic variants that cause nearsightedness, or myopia, are associated with reproductive benefits.
Science Lovers is an online dating service that’ll help you find and connect with people like you. Our goal is simple – to add love, romance and fun to the lives of.
New to reddit? Click here! Submissions must be verifiable. Please link directly to a reliable source that supports every claim in your post title. Images alone do not count as valid references. Videos are fine so long as they come from reputable sources e. BBC, Discovery, etc. No personal opinions, anecdotes or subjective statements e.
Online dating may be breaking down society’s racial divisions
In fact, it might be a matter of clicks. Those with a penchant for the old fashioned rituals of dating might choose to trade in the likes of Bumble, Tinder and Hinge for something a little more nostalgic. Enter, dating websites. Given that we’re currently under lockdown, we couldn’t find love at first sight in a bar even if we wanted to.
Not only do dating sites actually offer users the option of specificity, something that is notably lacking on its app-based counterparts, but they generally offer a much wider pool of singletons.
I thought it was a joke when Alex Berezow of Real Clear Science sent this to me. You know, someone sets up a spoof site for laughs because.
Full Site. Physical Sciences. Subscribe to the newsletter. Science 2. New Scientist New Feature – Dating! Even the. New Scientist , famous for articles proclaiming ‘ Darwin was wrong ‘ – maybe the only science article Texas Gov. Rick Perry ever read – and hiring a neuroscience company to design a cover to dupe you into buying their magazine and bragging about having secret access to the CMS experiment at the LHC not to mention highlighting a researcher who claims the Internet causes Autism has ventured into new ground once again, this time uncovering the mysteries of
News + Events
And the data here, too, suggest that this pandemic is actually changing the courtship process is some positive ways. Foremost, coronavirus has slowed things down. This pandemic has forced singles to return to more traditional wooing: getting to know someone before the kissing starts. An astonishing 6, men and women replied.
Subscriber Account active since. For those dipping their toes into the dating pool during stay-at-home orders, it’s been like swimming in a version of Netflix’s reality series ” Love is Blind. In the show, contestants must get engaged before ever actually meeting one another in person. And while a lockdown engagement might be a bit extreme, it’s entirely possible that two people have grown to really like one another over the previous weeks and months.
Maybe it started with a match on a dating app, followed by flirting over text. Then came regularly scheduled Zoom dates. Perhaps they’ve even started envisioning a future together. Now, as states start to ease restrictions, some may have broached taking the next step: an in-person rendezvous.
T oday in Britain one in five heterosexual couples met online and a whopping 70 per cent of homosexual couples found their partner via the web. New research is suggesting there could be very real problems with internet dating. Michigan State University found that married couples who met online are three times more likely to divorce than those who met face to face. And online daters are 28 per cent more likely to split from their partners within the first year. Even the CEO of Match admits that online dating cycles are shorter because people are more willing to leave unsatisfying relationships.
Paradoxically, by opening up a new world of choice, we have become aware that there could always been someone better just a click away. I n that way, sexual attraction is similar to hunger. And the chances of opposites attracting? In other words you are looking for a clone. In fact, the most compatible partner genetically would be the one who is the least like you.
In terms of evolutionary biology it is easy to see the benefit of having one partner who is less susceptible to getting colds or flu while another has greater immunity to measles. Connections First Impressions The quickest way to connect with others. Matches Find out who you match with.
‘Hey’: short messages are the best dating site strategy, study says
New Scientist, first published on 22 November , is a weekly English-language magazine Sold in retail outlets (paper edition) and on subscription (paper and/or online), the magazine covers news, features, In the same year the magazine launched a dating service, NewScientistConnect, operated by The Dating Lab.
Subscribers to the print edition have free access to all articles and the archive of past content that has so far been digitised. Online readership takes various forms. Overall free views of an elite database of best , articles are On social media there are 3. New Scientist has published books derived from its content, online of which are selected questions and answers from the Last Word section of the account and website:.
New Scientist has best worked with elite publishers to produce books based on the dating‘s copy:. In Arc ,"a new digital site from the makers of New Scientist , exploring the future through the world of science fiction” and fact was launched. The monthly magazine, published by Veen Media, is sold in the Netherlands and Belgium. Since New Scientist has held an annual science profiles in London. Styled New Scientist Live , the event has attracted high-profile sites and science statistics. In September , New Scientist was criticised by science fiction writer Greg Egan , who wrote that"a sensationalist bent and a lack of basic knowledge by its writers” was making the magazine’s coverage best unreliable"to constitute a elite threat to the online app of science”.
In particular, Egan found himself"gobsmacked by the level of scientific illiteracy” in the magazine’s coverage  of Roger Shawyer’s ” electromagnetic drive “, best New Scientist allowed the publication of “online double-talk” designed to bypass a fatal objection to Shawyer’s proposed space dating, namely that it violates the profiles of conservation of momentum. Egan urged sites to write to New Scientist and pressure the app to raise its standards, best of “squandering the profiles that the magazine’s circulation and dating provides”.
In January , New Scientist ran a cover with the title ” Darwin was wrong”.